This constitutional amendment question will be on every ballot across the state, and its intentionally confusing language makes it seem like it’s anti-discrimination, but the devil is in the details.
Isn’t that already the law? Since when is government discrimination legal?
Correct, it is already the law. The point of this article is that the amendment _weakens_ protections, not strengthens them.
Isn’t that already the law? Since when is government discrimination legal?
Correct, it is already the law. The point of this article is that the amendment _weakens_ protections, not strengthens them.